topics
FACEBOOK
TWITTERYou probably remember the famous court case last year in which Google was accused of wiretapping because its “street view” cars gathered fragments of Internet traffic from unencrypted wifi networks across the country.
This ruling seemed to indicate that anyone who “sniffed” or looked at unencrypted data on an open wifi network was committing the crime of wiretapping.
A federal judge in Illinois may have set a new precedent by ruling the exact opposite way in a recent court case. Read on for more startling details.
TWEET
Print
email